Skip to content
← All casesML Pipeline + S&OPEnterprise

IBP: Demand Forecasting

ML model accuracy 88→95%, planning cycle 12→4 days, ₽263–550M/year impact

At a glance
Client accuracy: 88% → 95%

CTO / Technical Director

1 год · 6 чел

  • Python
  • ML Pipeline
  • Anaplan
  • SAP BW
  • S&OP Framework

Expand the deep-dive ↓

Problem

What doesn't work

Freight transportation planning was manual: commercial directors manually determined volumes by clients and routes. Production plan accuracy by clients — 88%, by routes — 59%. Planning cycle — 12 days. Labor costs — ~180 person-days per year.

Solution

Architectural approach

Automated demand forecasting across the network (unconstrained demand) with ML models. Integration into S&OP process: scenario planning, freight base optimization. 3 MVP phases: forecast for PV → expansion to KR → all RPS regions. Corporate architect on the project team.

My role & contribution

CTO / Technical Director

Corporate architect on the project. Designed ML forecast integration with Optimizer and Navigator. Defined the 3-phase MVP strategy. Justified the business case to the Board (₽263-550M/year impact, accuracy-to-revenue correlation = 0.798).

Ready to discuss?

If you need an architect who builds autonomous AI systems — reach out.

Serbia-based · CET/CEST timezone · EU-aligned working hours · International contracts experience